Viewing sample resized to 44% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Reuploaded without using motion interpolation in order to reach "quality standards".

I was working on this for 2 and a half months. Hope you guys will like it.

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Kinda bullshit that a site that wants to taut itself as an 'archival site' pulls this 'quality standard' nonsense imo. The old one was great, nice work mate.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 13
  • jwt07 said:
    Kinda bullshit that a site that wants to taut itself as an 'archival site' pulls this 'quality standard' nonsense imo. The old one was great, nice work mate.

    It's almost like motion interpolation looks gross to most people who have an eye for good animation. Almost every post that uses it gets taken down, this artist isn't special in that regard. Relax.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • bitWolfy

    Former Staff

    jwt07 said:
    Kinda bullshit that a site that wants to taut itself as an 'archival site' pulls this 'quality standard' nonsense imo. The old one was great, nice work mate.

    As an art archive, we want to preserve artwork in the best quality possible.
    What part of that confuses you?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • bitwolfy said:
    As an art archive, we want to preserve artwork in the best quality possible.
    What part of that confuses you?

    Art is art my guy, it may not all be five star tier quality but it should still be preserved in my opnion.
    Lol, but I am a bit of a horder of content so that may just be me.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 13