Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Coan
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 17:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO Coan looks like a promising journalist, but not yet. 143 GHits and 1 Press release. Did not win the only prize he was nominated.--Legionarius (talk) 07:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of notability. JJL (talk) 03:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn. Sting_au Talk 03:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An associate editor on a magazine is about as non-Notable as you can get. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per notability standards, but more importantly fails WP:V despite notices on page since May 2007... — BQZip01 — talk 06:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.