April 7th:It's that time again e621! The 2025 staff drive will be opening later this week! Please get your resumes and forklift licenses ready and keep an eye on the news/forums. Hope to see some fresh meat for the salt mines.
Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.
Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.
Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
Ragnars rock
Memberyeah.
Evolution nlt being age based can make for some very wack misidentification of age in pokemon.
A ralts could be 50 years older than a gallade, and no one would know
The Unnamed Visitor
MemberEvolution is based on environmental factors, and has nothing to do with the age of the Pokemon. The misconception seems to be that because IRL animals who go through metamorphosis do so based on age, people try applying that logic to Pokemon, which doesn't make sense when you think about it. Applying real world logic to the Pokemon world quickly makes a lot of things fall apart in the logic.
Login to respond »