Okay, but how doesn't it meet guidelines? That's really vague, post flagger.

windthorpryas said:
Okay, but how doesn't it meet guidelines? That's really vague, post flagger.

that's the default flag, they cant write out a better one, you only are allowed to select form a certain list of them.
I'd assume it's because of the clipping in the animation, pomni's thighs clip into jax's pretty noticeably in the middle of the animation

While I'm not a huge fan of the content on display here, I really don't see any issue worthy of flagging in this video. The animation's smooth enough, and the hip clipping's not so egregious as to get the entire thing removed. Even the tags meet the minimum requirement (I think. I'm not an expert E621 rule lawyer.)

Maybe the flagger sees something we don't? Or is trying to flag something else altogether? That's about all of the acceptable reasons I can think of.

First time uploading in E621 (bc there is A LOT of videos and images that are in other sites that aren't here) and get flagged for... absolutely nothing wrong ? I could understand the tags but they match the video

theobservingeye said:
While I'm not a huge fan of the content on display here, I really don't see any issue worthy of flagging in this video. The animation's smooth enough, and the hip clipping's not so egregious as to get the entire thing removed. Even the tags meet the minimum requirement (I think. I'm not an expert E621 rule lawyer.)

Maybe the flagger sees something we don't? Or is trying to flag something else altogether? That's about all of the acceptable reasons I can think of.

Idk man it sometimes feels like some of the animations are flagged all cause the person who flagged it just didn't like the animation overall

manitka said:
that's the default flag, they cant write out a better one, you only are allowed to select form a certain list of them.
I'd assume it's because of the clipping in the animation, pomni's thighs clip into jax's pretty noticeably in the middle of the animation

I'VE SEEN WORSE ANIMATION QUALITY THAN THIS 😭 unwarranted flag tbh

Maybe they just don't like seeing their favorite characters getting treated like bottoms XD

The only thing I thought they could try to justify is the "young human" thing but Pomni is canonically 25 according to the creator. And I'm not a fan of the art style, but that is a huge stretch if they try to claim that. I mean look at the model that chose?

hey mods can we have a more in-depth flagging system so we don't have this type of confusion on a daily basis

Mairo said:

piano0000000 said:
hey mods can we have a more in-depth flagging system so we don't have this type of confusion on a daily basis

No?
You don't really have to be confused because it's none of your responsibility to deal with the flag and site has moved the opposite direction of removing free text fields from flags because they are just usually full of nonsense.

Also people who do handle flags, are aware of sites rules and guidelines to deal with even vague flags. Only flags requiring further information are usually tracing situations for source of trace.

Mate there's been many cases especially as of lately when there would be a flag for no reason. Just because you work for the crew doesn't make everyone competent when it comes to these flags. Hell I've seen you flag animation labeling it as human only when nothing within the animation is just only human

ddholmes said:
Mate there's been many cases especially as of lately when there would be a flag for no reason. Just because you work for the crew doesn't make everyone competent when it comes to these flags. Hell I've seen you flag animation labeling it as human only when nothing within the animation is just only human

This is like literally the reason why I do not like responding to dmails I get these days, it's copy-paste responces from guidelines, then people get angry at me for not talking to them but slamming them with the book because somehow that changes the situation when I waste my time explaining same stuff that's already written down.

"But the post did not have any humans in it, restore it" is one of the most common dmails I get from deletions that have been correct for irrelevancy under uploading guidelines humans section. However really often this is on basis that the user knows the character from mass media property and knows they are not supposed to be human or it's author who didn't mean to portray them as human, but everyone is constantly missing that's not what's written on the guidelines or how tag what you see operates.
Then person who is more aware of how site operates, flags the post, which causes fucking protest in the comment section because princess bubblegum porn everyone liked is getting deleted now! And this is why flagger name is nowdays also hidden on top of other reasons so that people who do actually good work aren't constantly being harrassed.

Alternatively it's flagger who flags content just to try to get it deleted and tries that by constantly flagging stuff they do not like or think they interpeted to not be acceptable.
...but at that point why do users need to deal with this? We have admins and moderators for this, which have more insight on the situation and can talk to user doing things if they are unsure as to why they keep flagging stuff and hand out records if it's more obvious and these do not happen that often enough to warrant change how things are currently handled and even that's not up to users to behold to individual malicious users, staff is for that.

Basically just calm the fuck down and let stuff be handled. There are discussions internally to improve upon the system in general, but going back towards the dark past of previous ownership and fully free text, most likely won't happen for many reasons.