Viewing sample resized to 44% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

You shouldn't have stared at that Rathian for too long during your last hunt, now your mount needs to remind you don't need anyone else in your life.

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • thereddummy said:
    I was expecting beastiality and was about to downvote... then it played on him and... omg that was adorable

    If bestiality was included it would have been tagged and the post marked as explicit. In any case, you should blacklist that instead of... watching such content and downvoting just because it's not your thing.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 362
  • thereddummy said:
    I was expecting beastiality and was about to downvote... then it played on him and... omg that was adorable

    Down voting people's work because they don't have bestiality is such an asshole move lmao.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 31
  • RTF

    Member

    ivorylagiacrus said:
    If bestiality was included it would have been tagged and the post marked as explicit. In any case, you should blacklist that instead of... watching such content and downvoting just because it's not your thing.

    maybe they did blacklist that tag, but maybe they thought the person who uploaded this video didn't add that tag to this video, but it wasn't a video that needed that tag anyways, so it's fine they thought. (?)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • RTF

    Member

    mrbigbadbully said:
    Down voting people's work because they don't have bestiality is such an asshole move lmao.

    no, they were going to downvote it because if it had that, it didn't so they didn't downvote it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • RTF

    Member

    thereddummy said:
    *layed, not played... dang auto correct

    you could've just edited your comment, instead of telling us you know.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • SCTH

    Member

    ivorylagiacrus said:
    If bestiality was included it would have been tagged and the post marked as explicit. In any case, you should blacklist that instead of... watching such content and downvoting just because it's not your thing.

    That said, bestiality is in a weird situation where due to it being implied by things like human_on_feral, it can be valid even for things that are romantic rather than actively sexual. It's a rather strange situation, because tags like human_on_anthro explicitly include romance, so while human_on_feral says it's just for sexual interaction the fact that other tags in the category include romance means it ends up getting tagged for romance too. If it doesn't include romance then there is no tag that does cover human/feral or anthro/feral romance, but the implication to bestiality makes it a tricky situation.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • rtf said:
    no, they were going to downvote it because if it had that, it didn't so they didn't downvote it.

    Oh shit, I actually misread lmfao. Still either with or not bestiality. It's still pretty stupid to downvote people's work over it. Just use blacklist lol.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • This is some wholesome bonding right here. Once again proving that the Seikret was the best addition to the Monster Hunter series.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • > I was expecting beastiality and was about to downvote... then it played on him and... omg that was adorable
    Oh shit guys CAREFUL HE IS ABOUT TO DOWNVOTE
    Alert the media!

    @ivorylagiacrus
    You are doing god's work, King.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • thereddummy said:
    *layed, not played... dang auto correct

    edit your old comment instead of posting a new one, please
    and just stop using autocorrect, please

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • ivorylagiacrus said:
    If bestiality was included it would have been tagged and the post marked as explicit. In any case, you should blacklist that instead of... watching such content and downvoting just because it's not your thing.

    i made an account just to give this guy a W

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0